Voting by Eliminating Quantifiers
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mathematical theory of voting and social choice has attracted much attention. In the general setting one can view social choice as a method of aggregating individual, often conflicting preferences and making a choice that is the best compromise. How preferences are expressed and what is the “best compromise” varies and heavily depends on a particular situation. The method we propose in this paper depends on expressing individual preferences of voters and specifying properties of the resulting ranking by means of first-order formulas. Then, as a technical tool, we use methods of second-order quantifier elimination to analyze and compute results of voting. We show how to specify voting, how to compute resulting rankings and how to verify voting protocols.
منابع مشابه
Protecting Against Privacy Compromise and Ballot Stuffing by Eliminating Non-Determinism from End-to-end Voting Schemes
End-to-end voting schemes have been researched significantly over the past two decades and aim to establish voter verifiable elections. Many of these schemes rely on non-deterministic inputs, such as the randomness used in encryption, for several tasks in the voting process. Karlof et al. show that the randomness in a scheme by Neff enables potential malicious subliminal channels. We revist the...
متن کاملCOMBINING FUZZY QUANTIFIERS AND NEAT OPERATORS FOR SOFT COMPUTING
This paper will introduce a new method to obtain the order weightsof the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator. We will first show therelation between fuzzy quantifiers and neat OWA operators and then offer anew combination of them. Fuzzy quantifiers are applied for soft computingin modeling the optimism degree of the decision maker. In using neat operators,the ordering of the inputs is not...
متن کاملOn the Elimination of Quantifiers through Descriptors in Predicate Logic
We present a variant of the Davis–Fechter’s technique for eliminating quantifiers in first-order logic, aimed at reducing the incidence of irrelevant dependencies in the construction of Skolem terms. The basic idea behind this contribution is to treat as a single syntactic unit every maximal ‘quantifier batch’, i.e., group of contiguous alike quantifiers, whose internal order (which has no sign...
متن کاملEliminating the Weakest Link: Making Manipulation Intractable?
Successive elimination of candidates is often a route to making manipulation intractable to compute. We prove that eliminating candidates does not necessarily increase the computational complexity of manipulation. However, for many voting rules used in practice, the computational complexity increases. For example, it is already known that it is NP-hard to compute how a single voter can manipula...
متن کاملSequential Elimination vs. Instantaneous Voting
Voting procedures eliminating candidates sequentially and one-at-a-time based on repeated ballots are superior to well-known single-round voting rules: if voters are strategic the former will induce the Condorcet winner in unique equilibrium, whereas the latter may fail to select it. In addition, when there is no Condorcet winner the outcome of sequential elimination voting always belongs to th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Studia Logica
دوره 92 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009